‘The Devil Wears Prada 2’ Is Here — So How Much of the Original Was Actually True?
With the sequel now in theaters, the Anna Wintour comparisons, Vogue assistant lore, and real-life Emily chatter are back.
The Devil Wears Prada 2 is officially in theaters, which means Miranda Priestly is back, Andy Sachs is back, Emily Charlton is back, and yes, the Anna Wintour comparisons are back, too.
The sequel premiered May 1, 2026, nearly 20 years after the original movie turned icy editor-in-chief Miranda Priestly into one of the most quoted bosses in pop culture. The new film brings back Meryl Streep, Anne Hathaway, Emily Blunt, and Stanley Tucci, with David Frankel returning as director and Aline Brosh McKenna returning as writer.
According to Disney, the sequel picks up two decades after Andy’s first chaotic months at Runway. Miranda is now facing a magazine publishing industry in flux, while Emily has become a major player at a luxury brand.
That alone would be enough to get fans talking. But the sequel has also reopened the bigger question that has followed The Devil Wears Prada since the book came out in 2003: how much of this story was actually based on real life?
The answer is still a little messy, which is probably why people are still so obsessed with it.
The Book Came From a Very Real Vogue Job
Before The Devil Wears Prada became a movie, it was a 2003 novel by Lauren Weisberger. And Weisberger really did work as an assistant to Anna Wintour at Vogue.
That connection has always been central to the fascination around the story. Weisberger began working for Wintour in December 1999, just a few months after graduating from Cornell University, and stayed in the role for less than a year, according to People.
In the fictional version, Andy Sachs lands a job as an assistant to Miranda Priestly, the fearsome editor-in-chief of Runway magazine. The similarities are not exactly subtle, even if Weisberger has long maintained that Miranda is a fictional character.
That is where the whole thing gets interesting. It was not a memoir. It was not marketed as journalism. But it was clearly close enough to the fashion media world that readers, critics, and former Vogue insiders have been dissecting it for more than two decades.
Anna Wintour Has Never Fully Played Along
Wintour’s public response to the Miranda Priestly conversation has always been its own little performance.
According to Entertainment Weekly, Amy Odell’s Anna: The Biography claimed that when Wintour learned The Devil Wears Prada had been sold to Doubleday, she reportedly told managing editor Laurie Jones, “I cannot remember who that girl is,” referring to Lauren Weisberger.
That is almost too perfectly icy for a story about a fictional fashion editor everyone insists is not based on her.
Wintour did later attend the 2006 film premiere while wearing Prada. According to the same EW piece, director David Frankel was seated behind Wintour and her daughter, Bee, during the screening. Odell wrote that Bee turned to her mother at one point and said, “Mom, they really got you.”
Still, Wintour publicly took the movie in stride. In a 2006 interview with Barbara Walters, she said, “Anything that makes fashion entertaining and glamorous and interesting is wonderful for our industry. So I was 100 percent behind it,” according to EW.
That is not exactly a confession. It is not exactly a denial either.
Very Miranda, frankly.
Meryl Streep Has Said She Thought About Wintour While Building Miranda
One thing that makes the whole conversation even more layered is that Streep has acknowledged thinking about Wintour while shaping Miranda Priestly.
In a 2026 Vogue cover conversation with Wintour, Streep discussed drawing inspiration from Wintour while creating the character, especially when thinking about power, style, and the pressure of being watched.
That does not mean Miranda is a one-to-one Wintour impression. Streep’s performance is much sharper and stranger than that. She made Miranda terrifying without making her loud, which is part of why the character still works.
She does not scream. She barely raises her voice. She just looks vaguely disappointed and takes control of the room.
The “Real Emily” Recently Entered the Chat
The timing here is also handy because the conversation around Emily Charlton has gotten a fresh update.
Celebrity stylist Leslie Fremar recently spoke with Vogue about being the real-life inspiration for Emily, the senior assistant played by Emily Blunt in the original movie. Fremar worked in Wintour’s orbit in the late 1990s and later built a major career as a Hollywood stylist.
In Vogue’s interview, Fremar reflected on the strict office culture at the time and her complicated feelings about seeing pieces of that world turned into a bestselling book and movie.
That detail adds a whole new layer to Emily’s character. In the movie, she is funny because she is intense, blunt, and constantly on the edge of collapse. But viewed through a real workplace lens, she also represents the assistant who had already bought into the system and could not understand why Andy did not.
Emily may be one of the most realistic characters in the whole thing.
Why the Sequel Makes the True-Story Question Feel Fresh Again
The original Devil Wears Prada was about a young woman entering a glamorous workplace that slowly starts to eat her life.
The sequel appears to be playing with a different kind of tension. Disney describes Miranda as facing a changing publishing industry, while Andy returns as a more confident adult and Emily has moved into luxury branding.
That shift matters because the media and fashion industries are not what they were in 2006. Magazines no longer have the same monopoly on taste. Luxury brands have their own media machines. Influencers, stylists, TikTok, celebrity partnerships, and digital platforms all have more power than they did when Andy first walked into Runway looking like she had never heard of an eyelash curler.
So while the first movie was about surviving the old-fashioned media machine, the sequel seems positioned around what happens when that machine has to fight for relevance.
So, Was ‘The Devil Wears Prada’ Really Based on a True Story?
The safest answer is: loosely.
The original story was fiction, but it was clearly inspired by Weisberger’s real experience as Wintour’s assistant and the broader world of early-2000s fashion media. Weisberger has said Miranda was fictional. Wintour has pushed back on the idea that the movie reflects Vogue. Former insiders have still recognized pieces of the world they lived in.
That gray area is exactly why the story has lasted.
The Devil Wears Prada was never just about one boss or one assistant job. It was about ambition, status, workplace power, and what people are willing to tolerate for a job everyone else thinks they should be grateful to have.
Now that The Devil Wears Prada 2 is finally here, the movie has already sparked plenty of side conversations beyond Miranda and Andy’s real-life inspirations. Adrian Grenier recently addressed his absence from the sequel in a very tongue-in-cheek Starbucks ad, and the fashion world is still giving people plenty to debate, too, including Jean Paul Gaultier’s NSFW bodysuit that had the internet wondering whether Paris Fashion Week had gone too far.
Miranda Priestly may be fictional, but the obsession around her has always been extremely real.
Adrian Grenier Just Addressed His Devil Wears Prada 2 Absence in a Starbucks Ad — and Honestly, It’s Pretty Funny
The actor is leaning into the Nate backlash, joking that his character should probably stay in 2006.
Jean Paul Gaultier’s NSFW Bodysuit Has the Internet Wondering If Paris Fashion Week Has Gone Too Far
One look showed “everything.” The rest wasn’t far behind.
Read more: Jean Paul Gaultier’s NSFW Bodysuit Has the Internet Wondering If Paris Fashion Week Has Gone Too Far
